This is a matter on which the board should…
🔗 View originalhttps://archive.org/details/silvercity1888
Primary copy hosted at archive.org — opens in a new tab.
Entities extracted from this source (3)
Robert Reddingperson
3 claims cited from this source
a.k.a. Redding, Robt. Redding, Bob Redding
George W. Manleyperson
1 claim cited from this source
a.k.a. George Manley, Manley, Geo. W. Manley
Copper Point Minething
1 claim cited from this source
a.k.a. Copper Point mine
Chunks (1)
chunk 381 · paragraph 1344
of the Luna and upper Frisco valley will
be diverted from Socorro in this direction, and
is worth looking after.”
This is a matter on which the board should
act at its next meeting. There is no time for
delay.
“NOT GUILTY”
Was the Verdict of the Jury in the
Redding Case
The trial of the case of the territory vs.
Robert Redding, indicted for the killing of
George W. Manley, at Central City, Oct. 3rd,
1888, was begun Friday morning the 21st in-
stant, in the district court now in session here,
and terminated at 10 o’clock Saturday night,
the 22nd. The case was one of absorbing in-
terest. It is probable that no case tried in this
county ever attracted more attention. The court
house was thronged with anxious spectators
from the beginning to the end of the trial, and
on Saturday night, when the final arguments
were being made, there was scarcely standing
room in the court house, the audience consisting
of many of the best people in the community,
including a great many ladies.
HISTORY OF THE CASE
In the spring of 1888, Robt. Redding sold
to Mrs. Chiles his interest in the Copper Point
mine, in Lone Mountain district, this county,
placing the deed in escrow, to be delivered upon
the payment of the balance of the purchase
price within 30 days.