It will be observed that we have not ex-…
🔗 View originalhttps://archive.org/details/silvercity1888
Primary copy hosted at archive.org — opens in a new tab.
Entities extracted from this source (3)
Present Sheriffperson
3 claims cited from this source
a.k.a. the present sheriff, sheriff
Grand Juryorg
1 claim cited from this source
a.k.a. grand jury, the grand jury, late grand jury
D. P. Carrperson
1 claim cited from this source
a.k.a. D. P. Carr, Foreman
Chunks (1)
chunk 515 · paragraph 1995
warrant on
a prisoner in the county jail — $96.75, and serv-
ing two subpoenas on the same three persons in
each case, in Silver City, upon the returns of
which mileage was charged at $21 on each
subpoena — making $138.75 for mileage charged
for services made in Silver City.
It will be observed that we have not ex-
tended this investigation to the terms of officials
preceding the incumbents. The limited time
would not admit of this, as we deemed the
present conditions of county affairs of more
importance. We recommend the appointment
by the court of two experts in accounts of county
officers to continue the investigation of county
affairs from 1885 to the present time — they to
be paid by the county.
The probate clerk, being absent and the
probate judge having no records outside of the
clerk’s office, no examination was made in pro-
bate matters.
The grand jury recommends that action at
law be commenced against the officials (ana
their bondsmen) who have been beneficiaries
of the peculations which we have reported.
Respectfully submitted,
D. P. Carr, Foreman.
Enterprise Editorial— September 5, 1890
THE REPORTFor the past two weeks this city and Grant
County has been enjoying an excitement the
like of which has never been experienced here
before and it is to be hoped never will be again.