"E. T. Hubbard: Gila Medicine Man"

The chunks support: ^[1] and ^[2] are identical and contain the key info.

Hubbard arrived in Gila, New Mexico ^[2][1]." But careful: the chunk says "He is at Work on the Gila" - the newspaper is from that date, reporting his presence.

Also "came from Hubbard, Arizona" ^[1]. "He has a medicine that will cure any disease" ^[1][2]. "After a man has taken a course of this medicine he never will be sick again" ^[1]. "He explains that the patient is liable to be sick this is the working out of the disease" ^[1].

Hubbard was a man working on the Gila in Southern New Mexico who claimed to have a medicine that cures any disease." Then the body: "On June 23, 1903, Hubbard arrived in Gila, New Mexico ^[2][1]. He came from Hubbard, Arizona ^[1]. According to the Lordsburg Liberal, Hubbard claimed to possess a medicine that could cure any disease ^[1][2]. He further asserted that after a course of this medicine, a person would never fall ill again ^[1]. He explained that patients might become sick during treatment, as the medicine worked out the disease and its relics ^[1]."

We can say "he owned a medicine he claimed could cure any disease" ^[1].

So we should add ^[2][1] at the end of the lead.

Hubbard was a man working on the Gila in Southern New Mexico who claimed to have a medicine that cures any disease ^[2][1]."

Then "---" then body: "On June 23, 1903, Hubbard arrived in Gila, New Mexico ^[2][1]. He came from Hubbard, Arizona ^[1]. According to the Lordsburg Liberal, Hubbard owned a medicine that could cure any disease, and he asserted that after a course of this medicine, a person would never be sick again ^[1][2]. He explained that patients might become ill during treatment as the medicine worked out the disease and its relics ^[1]."

The sentence about coming from Hubbard cites ^[1] only. The sentence about explanation cites ^[1].